Please remember this is a user-to-user community that relies on member participation. We encourage you to ask questions AND share your own thoughts, experience and advice.
We appear to have some BASIC priorities messed up...
The T2 Basic CANNOT even "eco-file"
Instead of a DISCOUNT for "eco-filing" the charge is an ADDITIONAL $400.00!
With current program capabilities, it would be much more appropriate for the "Premier" to be $800 (or ideally much less)
And the "Basic" slapped with a "carbon tax" of least $400...
.
Page 1 of 1
T2 pricing Basic/Premier
MultiQuote
#2
RL Tax Joe 
- Professional Member
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 500
- Joined: 26-February 07
- Gender:Male
Posted 21 February 2008 - 06:55 PM
Joe, on Feb 21 2008, 12:15 PM, said:
We appear to have some BASIC priorities messed up...
The T2 Basic CANNOT even "eco-file"
Instead of a DISCOUNT for "eco-filing" the charge is an ADDITIONAL $400.00!
With current program capabilities, it would be much more appropriate for the "Premier" to be $800 (or ideally much less)
And the "Basic" slapped with a "carbon tax" of least $400...
.
The T2 Basic CANNOT even "eco-file"
Instead of a DISCOUNT for "eco-filing" the charge is an ADDITIONAL $400.00!
With current program capabilities, it would be much more appropriate for the "Premier" to be $800 (or ideally much less)
And the "Basic" slapped with a "carbon tax" of least $400...
.
Hippy!
Just kidding Joe. I agree with you that basic e-file should be on all...ALL software. It is not really a special feature anymore.
#3
Reg
- Professional Member
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 504
- Joined: 08-March 06
- Gender:Male
- Location:Madeira Park, BC
Posted 22 February 2008 - 12:37 AM
Joe:
Thanks for keeping up the good fight on this one.
With the number of times efiling T2's has been mentioned, one would think a software company that cared about its customers would have done something about it.
Reg
Thanks for keeping up the good fight on this one.
With the number of times efiling T2's has been mentioned, one would think a software company that cared about its customers would have done something about it.
Reg
#4
JohnV
- Top Contributor
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1,017
- Joined: 03-December 01
- Location:Edjadaglash
Posted 22 February 2008 - 06:05 PM
I don't efile, so I can't sympathise. I guess Intuit feels it's a "convenience" users will pay for, or it is "in demand" from users' clients, so again an increased price is collectible...
But I always avoid subsequent August September requests to substantiate claims\income tec. They get it all up front. Plus my clients get a tangible item. When there's lots of paper, they see the value of time\expertise required to prepare their often complex returns.
But Joe, I buy paper made from 100% recycled fibres, so you don't have to be ecologically unfriendly to do the same.
And knowing where you live, it seems to me you'd be wanting to support your local industry :)
OOPS TeeToo Efiling. Me too!!!!!!!!!!!
Gotta love your persistence on this issue Joe. Start a poll here. I'll click yes.
John "got your back Joe" V
But I always avoid subsequent August September requests to substantiate claims\income tec. They get it all up front. Plus my clients get a tangible item. When there's lots of paper, they see the value of time\expertise required to prepare their often complex returns.
But Joe, I buy paper made from 100% recycled fibres, so you don't have to be ecologically unfriendly to do the same.
And knowing where you live, it seems to me you'd be wanting to support your local industry :)
OOPS TeeToo Efiling. Me too!!!!!!!!!!!
Gotta love your persistence on this issue Joe. Start a poll here. I'll click yes.
John "got your back Joe" V
Page 1 of 1