Please remember this is a user-to-user community that relies on member participation. We encourage you to ask questions AND share your own thoughts, experience and advice.
Client had self-employed income in Alberta in 2006 but lived in BC at end of December. The e-file help desk explained that's why it wasn't accepted but Profile audit did not warn me. Anyone experienced this problem?
Nuisance because now client has to come back and sign the T-1 jacket.
Page 1 of 1
E-file not accepted
MultiQuote
#3
unknown 
- Top Contributor
-
- Group: QuickBooks Pro Advisor, VOA
- Posts: 3,906
- Joined: 30-November 99
- Gender:Male
- Location:Alberta
-
Interests:Check out the data transfer utility:
http://www.q2q.us/index.htm
Posted 26 April 2007 - 07:55 PM
1. Where does the ITA state that a return should be signed?
2. Any self respecting efiler knows you cannot efile a multi-jurisdiction return.
2. Any self respecting efiler knows you cannot efile a multi-jurisdiction return.
#4
RL Tax Joe
- Professional Member
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 500
- Joined: 26-February 07
- Gender:Male
Posted 26 April 2007 - 08:03 PM
Stone, on Apr 26 2007, 02:01 PM, said:
Client had self-employed income in Alberta in 2006 but lived in BC at end of December. The e-file help desk explained that's why it wasn't accepted but Profile audit did not warn me. Anyone experienced this problem?
Nuisance because now client has to come back and sign the T-1 jacket.
Nuisance because now client has to come back and sign the T-1 jacket.
Staple the 183 to it if you are worried.
#5
Joe
- Top Contributor
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 3,921
- Joined: 01-December 02
Posted 26 April 2007 - 08:09 PM
Bert_Mulder_CGA, on Apr 26 2007, 12:55 PM, said:
1. Where does the ITA state that a return should be signed?
CRA could likely argue that it is S150(1) ...
The return being in "prescribed form" and having a place for a signature...
More importantly, an unsigned return gives the taxpayer an excellent reason to say:
"not my fault - the tax evasion on the return has nothing to do with me - my accountant did it all - I never saw that version and didnt know that it had been filed... "
PS: Not sure why we are in "Product installation and upgrades"?
.
#6
RL Tax Joe
- Professional Member
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 500
- Joined: 26-February 07
- Gender:Male
Posted 26 April 2007 - 08:15 PM
Joe, on Apr 26 2007, 03:09 PM, said:
CRA could likely argue that it is S150(1) ...
The return being in "prescribed form" and having a place for a signature...
More importantly, an unsigned return gives the taxpayer an excellent reason to say:
"not my fault - the tax evasion on the return has nothing to do with me - my accountant did it all - I never saw that version and didnt know that it had been filed... "
The return being in "prescribed form" and having a place for a signature...
More importantly, an unsigned return gives the taxpayer an excellent reason to say:
"not my fault - the tax evasion on the return has nothing to do with me - my accountant did it all - I never saw that version and didnt know that it had been filed... "
Staple the SIGNED T183 to it.
#7
Stone
- New Member
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 16-March 07
- Location:Vancouver
Posted 26 April 2007 - 08:20 PM
Joe, on Apr 26 2007, 01:09 PM, said:
CRA could likely argue that it is S150(1) ...
The return being in "prescribed form" and having a place for a signature...
More importantly, an unsigned return gives the taxpayer an excellent reason to say:
"not my fault - the tax evasion on the return has nothing to do with me - my accountant did it all - I never saw that version and didnt know that it had been filed... "
PS: Not sure why we are in "Product installation and upgrades"?
.
The return being in "prescribed form" and having a place for a signature...
More importantly, an unsigned return gives the taxpayer an excellent reason to say:
"not my fault - the tax evasion on the return has nothing to do with me - my accountant did it all - I never saw that version and didnt know that it had been filed... "
PS: Not sure why we are in "Product installation and upgrades"?
.
Oops, sorry, I'm a first-time poster and didn't pay attention to the category.
#8
RL Tax Joe
- Professional Member
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 500
- Joined: 26-February 07
- Gender:Male
Posted 26 April 2007 - 08:24 PM
Stone, on Apr 26 2007, 03:20 PM, said:
Oops, sorry, I'm a first-time poster and didn't pay attention to the category.
Don't think the category is the problem Mr. Stone
#9
David Blue
- Professional Member
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 832
- Joined: 02-December 01
Posted 26 April 2007 - 09:00 PM
Just attach a copy of the T183 to the paper return and send it in.
It is no big issue.
It is no big issue.
#10
Stone
- New Member
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 16-March 07
- Location:Vancouver
Posted 27 April 2007 - 05:29 AM
David Blue, on Apr 26 2007, 02:00 PM, said:
Just attach a copy of the T183 to the paper return and send it in.
It is no big issue.
It is no big issue.
Thanks to all for your comments and help, especially the suggestion to attach the signed 183.
- Carol Stone
Page 1 of 1